Cover of To Sir Phillip, With Love

Book profile

To Sir Phillip, With Love

Subgenre
romance
Edition year
2009-10-13
Rating
★ 3.4 · 309 ratingsExternal reader rating · Hardcover
Spice
Heat not verified

Trope map

Tags are supported by source descriptions; they are not reader votes. See how verification works.

Why these tropes fit

In this Regency-era romance, spirited spinster Eloise Bridgerton accepts a practical marriage proposal from Sir Phillip, a moody, ill-mannered man she has never met, and impulsively travels alone at night to meet him. Arriving at his home, she finds him rough, rugged and handsome, very unlike the polished London suitors she left behind. As they spend time together and share kisses, Eloise gradually wonders if this imperfect man might be her perfect match.

Get the book

Read the source evidence
  • Regency: “beloved Regency-set novels featuring the charming, powerful Bridgerton family” source
  • Grumpy x Sunshine: “Her perfect husband wouldn't be so moody and ill-mannered, and while Phillip was certainly handsome, he was a large brute of a man, rough and rugged, and totally unlike the London gentlemen vying for her hand” source
  • Marriage of Convenience: “Sir Phillip knew that Eloise Bridgerton was a spinster, and so he'd proposed, figuring that she'd be homely and unassuming, and more than a little desperate for an offer of marriage” source
  • Slow Burn: “she started thinking . . . and wondering . . . and before she knew it, she was in a hired carriage in the middle of the night, on her way to meet the man she hoped might be her perfect match. Except . . . he wasn't” source
  • Forced Proximity: “she was in a hired carriage in the middle of the night, on her way to meet the man she hoped might be her perfect match” source
  • Strong Heroine: “The beautiful woman on his doorstep was anything but quiet, and when she stopped talking long enough to close her mouth” source

Metadata source: Google Books. Quotes are used only to verify the tags.

Content notes

Content notes are not verified yet. This does not mean the book has no sensitive content.

Spot something that needs correcting?

Suggestions enter a review queue; they never change a book profile automatically.

More with overlapping tropes